too fixed and inflexible to changes (no way to change appearance of controls etc).support and future developmentВ kind biased towards their proprietary peripherals.very closed architecture (you cannot add or alter anything on your own) and proprietary peripheralВ products (like 'tree', 'Air' etc).responsive and functional menu driven visualization.complete set of ready-to-use blocks (ready controllers for alarm, PV, pool, ip doorphone etc).relative slightly entry lower priced (depending on configuration for example 1-w, modbus, RS-232 etc are all add-on modules).

stable and fast (no need to script, needs a kind of PLC configuration knowledge).

Good luck with your choice! (although thatВ should be simple now)ДЄs I have use both products (LM for a couple of years and Loxone for a couple of months just to test it), I can give you some pros & cons: I would say it's a no-brainer and go for LM, even if the price is slightly different, you get so much more from this sytem. The standard functions are easy to understand, but as Edgars said already you can do a lotВ more and develop your own functionsВ and that's where the knowledge of the sytem is needed.ДЄs you can see on the forum there is good support, but also direct from them. The amount of work realy depends on your goals, you can use the touch visu from LM to create a fast and easy visu, but you can also go crazy and build a great visu, its up to you. I can't say anything about stability but i can say that the LM is veryВ stable, so that garanty you already have ( For utillity proj ects the device is hardly usable because it's not designed for it and is missing a lot of functions for these projects. Loxone is typicaly designed for residential projects and is a 'whatВ you see is what you get product', if you need functionality that's not available you need to wait for manufactorer to add this

Knx loxone